![]() |
“When kids look up to great scientists the way they do to great musicians and actors, civilization will jump to the next level.”
So said Brian Greene, a physicist at Columbia University, in an interview with the New York Times.
Greene is also one of the founders of the World Science Festival, an annual celebration of science (this year’s festival runs June 10 until June 14 in New York).
I’ve discussed raising the profile of scientists to that of rock stars - will civilization really jump to the next level if this happens? What does that mean? In life sciences we already have a glut of scientists - there are far more postdoctoral researchers than there are professorships at universities. Demand far exceeds supply. A career in scientific research does not pay well, relative to the amount of education and training involved. It’s likely that most scientists - certainly myself included - chose science because they love the work, and not for the financial perks. I didn’t become a scientist because I wanted to be rich and famous.
Perhaps Greene isn’t suggesting changing the economics of science, but rather how people view science. Perhaps if scientists were admired like musicians and actors, society would have a better appreciation of science. How would this help civilization?


Why would a promising young scientist leave the lab to spend a year working for the United States government? Daniel Gorelick is here at the State Department trying to figure that out.