Guest blogger Roy Kamphausen is the director and vice president for political and security affairs of the Washington Office of the National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR).

An issue that came up often in Monday’s NBR-sponsored debate on U.S.-Asian relations in the next administration was the question of instability in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Both campaigns talked about the importance of addressing the terrorist haven that has developed in the tribal areas of Pakistan along the border with Afghanistan. This would allow the United States to reduce the number of cross-border attacks into Afghanistan and the accompanying danger posed to the United States and to the Pakistan by the presence of these terrorists. There was agreement that more funding for infrastructure projects, training for Afghan security forces and more U.S. and NATO troops are needed in Afghanistan, although they differed on how many and what type, and on what compromises might have to be made in U.S. military commitments in Iraq.

The Obama/Biden camp argued Bush and McCain had not taken the Afghanistan problem seriously several years ago, and that the Bush administration is now making a last attempt to kill or capture Bin Laden by attacking targets within Pakistan, an action that has drawn Pakistani fire. These actions, they argued, threaten to undermine the new civilian government in Pakistan as well as the larger U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

The McCain/Palin team argued that Obama should refrain from talking about unilaterally striking Pakistan, a U.S. ally in the war on terrorism, and that the problems facing Pakistan and the region require a complex and nuanced approach, rather than threats of attack or conditionality placed on U.S. aid to Pakistan. They also argued that Iraq remains important to U.S. credibility in South Asia and that McCain would not therefore reduce American commitments to Iraq in order to move troops to Afghanistan.

Obviously the obstacles to security and stability in the region are many and complex, and tough choices will have to be made. What do you think is the most critical ingredient in bringing peace and stability to this region of the world? How do we balance the issue of state sovereignty with the need to neutralize security threats within the borders of another country? Please leave your comments about these critical issues below.