U.S. history was made last night when the Democratic Party nominated Barack Obama, an African American, to the nation’s highest elected office. That milestone prompts reflection on how U.S. democracy, like all democracies, evolve.
Jean Rogers, deputy director of the Center for International Private Enterprise, shared her thoughts on the long road to equal opportunity in America in an entry on the CIPE Development Blog today.
Today is the 45th Anniversary of one of the most famous speeches in American history: “I have a dream.” Martin Luther King galvanized an audience of thousands as he spoke these hope-filled words from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in the heart of Washington DC. The dream speech came 100 years after the Emancipation Proclamation signed by Lincoln that freed slaves in the United States. King noted this and the fact that, despite that momentous step, blacks in the US still “languished in the corners of society” and lived on a “lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity.” They were political and economic outcasts in their own country. But they had found a voice for their grievance.
The times in which this speech was made were turbulent. American society heaved itself through change, wrenching through paroxysms of protest, pushback, violence, and small victories. Less than 3 months after King’s 1963 speech, an American president who championed change lay dead, and his successor politically strong-armed passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act as a memoriam through a reluctant Congress. It was another momentous step.
On paper, I’m too young to remember the earlier “separate but equal” approach that had been legal before CRA passage. My schools were always integrated. But practice in the deep South where I grew up took more than one law to change. I remember separate waiting rooms at the doctor’s offices and separate swimming pools in the summer. My high school class, 5 years after graduation, was the first in school history to have an integrated reunion.
The past 45 years have brought more change in the U.S., but few would say it’s been easy or become perfected. King grounded his speech in a call for the rule of law to prevail and the Constitutional promise of unalienable rights to be honored, for the nation conceived in liberty to truly provide liberty for all. He also called for economic change, recognizing that equal opportunity meant more than moving up “from a smaller ghetto to a larger one.” With many steps in these areas, both big and small, the U.S. has since become a stronger democracy.
Rule of law. Rights. Liberty. Justice. Opportunity. Stronger democracy. These resonate in many struggles still today, not just in the U.S. and not just on issues of race. I see this everyday in my work. Change is what CIPE is all about: strengthening democracy around the world. Our partners are the modern-day Martin Luther Kings of their own countries, reformers who give voice to the politically and economically dispossessed and who champion change. They often focus on the gulf between laws on paper and the practices of real life, and seek to change economies that permit only small islands of prosperity amidst vast seas of poverty.
I am reminded today in reflecting on the U.S.’s own path, that change does not come easily, that passing laws is essential and momentous but often insufficient, and that we should respect reformers, not be naïve about the difficulty of their calling, and support them as best we can. Because around the world, we all still have dreams.
What are your dreams for democracy? Share them here.
Comments (8)
Michael
6 September 2008 at 19:50 EDT
Permalink
“Rule of law. Rights. Liberty. Justice. Opportunity. Stronger democracy”!
Great words! This is democracy! But the poor of the world do not get this. That is the biggest challenge facing democracy!
Please refer to Haile Selassie speech to The United Nations about Equality and Rights for all people.
“You may say that I am a dreamer” in the words of John Lennon! Yes, but I dream that it is possible to improve the lot of the world’s poor, through the strength of unity of purpose, and long term strategic, common sense planning!
One Love! One people!
yours Michael Anthony Clay.
Sie.Kathieravealu
6 September 2008 at 20:05 EDT
Permalink
The present system of Democracy has to be changed to allow the people to have a more powerful say in the governance of their country.
In the present democratic system the parliament (The House of Peoples Representatives) with one set of peoples representatives has full power to govern the country in the way they want. The people have absolutely no power after the electing their representatives. The majority (half plus one) will on their own decide the future of the country. Checks, if any, are not powerful enough to control these representatives since they have all the powers concentrated in one place - the Parliament and it is considered “Supreme”.
My suggestion is that the various powers and duties conferred on the Parliament should be strictly separated and each of these different powers/duties be administered by different sets of representatives elected by the people directly.
In a human body - breathing, seeing, hearing, talking, digesting and other different and distinct functions are performed by different and distinct organs of the body to activate the body to do what is needed by the human being but all are inter-connected and are inter-dependent. Like-wise the Parliament should also function.
The intention of this suggestion is basically to eradicate corruption and other malpractices connected with it and more importantly the tendency towards dictatorial attitude of the small group of elected representatives who think no end of themselves.
This type of system is a must if democracy is to be developed in the developing countries, where corruption and dictatorial attitudes are the order of the day.
Any country in the developing world can be taken as an example notably Zimbawe and other countries that are known to the world
J. Momolu Kaindii, Jr.
17 September 2008 at 06:16 EDT
Permalink
Some time I personally wonder whether Africans have grabbed hold of the true meaning of the word “democracy”. For in many african societies, the word seems to portray meaning that suggest people participation into a voting process or the formation of several aimless political parties. I am often troubled by these shade of meanings. If people’s participation into a voting process or the formation of multiple political parties define democracy, then Africa as a continent could be said to be democratic.
On the contrary, Africa could be described as undemocratic, if democracy means respect for rule of law, human rights, justic and equality before the law, transparency, accountability
and equitable distribution of state resources by elected representatives.
Additionally, if democracy means full knowledge of the electorates of the critical national issues confronting the state, then, Africa is yet to become democratic because to date, about 80 percent of the African voters is illiterate. The majority of Africans has not become an independent voters. Their votes are still being externally influenced. Their votes do not come by internal convictions.
Further, Africa is yet to have institutionalized political parties. Most of Africa’s political parties died immediately after loosing power and the membership fast disintegrate and vacillate, usually to the ruling parties. Africa is yet to build pragmatic democratic institutions, characters and cultures in the true sense of the word.
It can only be hoped that Africa will get there in the future when 80 percent of its voters become literate and educated to the critical national challenges facing the individual states within the continent.
Apply food stamp
24 September 2008 at 20:37 EDT
Permalink
I wanted to research this subject and write a paper. Your post what a thousand words would not. Nice job.
carlo di fabio
26 September 2008 at 10:21 EDT
Permalink
my dream possibly soon comes through!
power to the people!
creating constitutional assemblys of
p e o p l e in germany, europe, the US…
members chosen by lottery as in ancient athens judges, senators…
facing the challenges of globalization we need desperatels new ways of political discussions + decisions. new institutions that make effective and innovative direct democracy possible. deep ecology + organic security, too.
hopefully the TV- and other media debates obama./.mc cain and your personal engagement will help to adress that message for b e t t e r f u t u r e s and c o m m o n wealth.
a common presidency needs support by people!
“we the people…” US-constitution
get more:
“carlo di fabio” GOOGLE
carlo.difabio@gmx.de
cheatteweanny
1 October 2008 at 05:17 EDT
Permalink
Hi
Nice site!
G’night
Abdulaziz Al-Ateeqi
15 October 2008 at 08:12 EDT
Permalink
ethics and words such as “Rule of law. Rights. Liberty. Justice. Opportunity. Stronger democracy” do not feed hungry mouths!
and hungry people would be more than glad to replace democracy with food.
what I said here is for the sake of shedding a light over other nations that don’t share our beliefs in democracy.
cheers
http://EXzombiesm.com
Jean Rogers
5 November 2008 at 15:53 EST
Permalink
Mr. Al-Ateeqi, thank you for your comment. You are right that people are very concerned about food on the table (and a roof over their heads, clothing — all of the basic needs Maslow identified). The question is: Who is more likely to concern themselves with these things for a whole country? A dictator whose word may not be questioned and who is shielded from dissenting opinion? Or an elected official who knows that the public will hold him accountable for how well he meets their expectations? Rule of law, rights, liberty, justice, opportunity and democracy are very powerful words when they are realized and acted upon, and they provide the mechanisms by which hungry mouths make themselves known, come out of the disenfranchised shadows and demand a place at the table. It takes more than an election, it takes day-to-day democratic processes, which many countries claiming to be democracies lack. With those processes, democracy does deliver.